Moderna & Pfizer Shots Hijack Immune Cells To Rewrite mRNA, Prolonging Spike Protein Production

by | May 16, 2025 | Headline News | 0 comments

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    This article was originally published by Lance D. Johnson at Natural News. 

    For years, health authorities assured the public that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were a temporary intervention, delivering a brief genetic message before harmlessly fading away. But a shocking new study published in Nature reveals a far darker reality: These shots don’t just deliver instructions — they reprogram the body to extend their lifespan, forcing cells to produce spike protein far longer than disclosed.

    The bombshell findings expose a hidden layer of genetic manipulation, raising urgent questions about long-term risks, informed consent, and the true cost of Big Pharma’s rushed “miracle” technology.

    Key points:

      • A new study in Nature confirms Moderna and Pfizer’s mRNA shots induce the body to produce an enzyme (TENT5A) that rewrites the vaccine’s mRNA, doubling its tail length and prolonging spike protein production.
      • Spike protein — linked to heart, brain, and immune damage — may persist for years, contradicting official claims it would last “a few weeks.”
      • Moderna’s own scientists admitted mRNA vaccines carry “unacceptable toxicity” risks in a 2024 paper, yet regulators greenlit them for billions.
      • The process hijacks immune cells (macrophages), forcing them to stabilize and amplify the synthetic mRNA, turning the body into an unwitting accomplice.
      • Novavax’s protein-based vaccine does not trigger this effect, suggesting the danger is unique to mRNA technology.

    The body’s betrayal: How mRNA shots rewrite their own code

    The Polish study (Krawczyk et al., 2025) reveals a chilling mechanism: After injection, immune cells detect the foreign mRNA and activate TENT5A — an enzyme that normally plays no role in vaccine responses. TENT5A then latches onto the vaccine’s genetic code, extending its poly(A) tail — a molecular “timer” that dictates how long mRNA survives. In some cases, Moderna’s mRNA tail doubled in length, from 100 to 200 nucleotides.

    “This wasn’t just persistence — it was amplification,” explains Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and outspoken critic of COVID vaccine safety. “The body is essentially tricked into editing the shot’s instructions to make it last longer. This was never part of the clinical trials.”

    A timeline of deception

    Public health officials repeatedly claimed mRNA vaccines were “short-lived.” Dr. Paul Offit, a CDC advisor, stated in 2021 that spike protein production would last “a couple of weeks.” Yet studies have since detected spike in blood samples for 187 days, 245 days, and even 709 days post-injection. Moderna’s internal documents acknowledge “challenges” with mRNA toxicity, yet these risks were buried beneath relentless propaganda touting the shots as “safe and effective.”

    The Nature study confirms the worst: The vaccines don’t just deliver a message — they reprogram the body to keep that message alive. “It’s like giving someone a self-replicating memo,” says molecular biologist Dr. Jessica Rose. “The memo was supposed to be read once and discarded. Instead, the recipient photocopies it endlessly.”

    Why Novavax escapes the trap

    Unlike mRNA shots, Novavax’s protein-based vaccine — which contains pre-made spike protein — does not trigger TENT5A activity. This critical distinction suggests the mRNA platform itself is the problem. “The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in Pfizer and Moderna’s shots are the Trojan horse,” explains immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle. “They smuggle synthetic mRNA into cells, but the payload doesn’t just fade away — it gets enhanced by the immune system.”

    The unanswered questions

      • Long-term damage: If spike protein lingers for years, what does that mean for cardiovascular, neurological, and autoimmune risks?
      • Informed consent: Were patients ever told their bodies might rewrite the vaccine’s code?
      • Regulatory failure: Why did agencies fast-track these shots while ignoring red flags about mRNA stability?

    The Nature study’s authors frame TENT5A’s role as a way to “enhance efficacy.” But for millions already injured, “efficacy” is a euphemism for uncontrolled biological manipulation. The truth is clear: These shots were never as temporary as claimed. The question now is: How many lives will be forever altered by their hidden toll?

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      0 Comments

      Submit a Comment

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.

          OSZAR »